In a surprising diplomatic turn, U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly assured Arab and Muslim leaders that he would not allow Israel to formally annex the occupied West Bank. The commitment came during a meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly, according to a Politico report citing six people familiar with the discussions.
Reuters
Two of those sources said Trump sounded especially firm. His team also presented what was described as a white paper that lays out the Trump administration’s broader plan to end the war in Gaza, including the clause to block annexation of the West Bank.
Reuters
Why the Promise Is Significant
The question of West Bank annexation is one of the most contested issues in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. For decades, Israel has maintained military control over parts of the territory, while Palestinians claim rights to establish their state there. Formal annexation would be a major step—effectively making parts of the West Bank sovereign Israeli territory.
By promising Arab leaders to block it, Trump is signaling a shift from a passive or ambiguous position to one of active intervention. For Arab states, ensuring that the West Bank isn’t absorbed by Israel may be a red line—one that would deepen regional anger and erode prospects for a negotiated peace.
Trump’s pledge may also be aimed at preserving the Abraham Accords—the normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states. Annexation could threaten those deals by provoking backlash from Arab capitals that took big political risks in normalizing ties with Israel.
Reactions and Responses
As of now, the White House has not publicly confirmed or denied the report. Observers note that Trump’s promise is in direct tension with support factions in Israel who advocate for annexing settlement blocks in the West Bank.
Reuters
+2
Haaretz
+2
Some Israeli leaders have long called for consolidation of control over parts of the West Bank—particularly areas with Israeli settlements. Among them, Bezalel Smotrich has pushed for wide annexation, arguing that much of the territory is “historic Jewish land.”
Wikipedia
Given Israel’s divided politics and coalition pressures, any U.S. intervention—public or behind the scenes—could sway decisions in Jerusalem. If Trump follows up on his promise with diplomatic, political, or even financial pressure, it could restrain annexation plans or force more cautious policies.
Challenges and Doubts
Implementation is uncertain. A promise alone does not guarantee action. Whether the U.S. can realistically prevent Israel from annexing territory will depend on diplomatic leverage, alliances, and whether Israel is willing to push back.
Domestic and political pressures. Some factions in Israel see annexation as not just desirable but necessary. Countering those voices may provoke a political backlash.
Regional trust. Arab states may regard promises skeptically unless they see consistent follow-through. Past U.S. assurances have sometimes disappointed regional partners.
Broader war and peace dynamics. The Gaza war, ongoing hostilities, and the humanitarian crisis may all exert stronger influence over policy than one territorial issue alone.
What to Watch Next
U.S. policy papers and public statements — whether the White House or State Department confirms or clarifies the annexation pledge.
Reactions from Arab countries — whether they accept the promise and whether their governments push Trump to stick to it.
Israeli government actions — whether plans for new settlements or annexation proposals are shelved or paused.
Diplomatic pressure on Israel — UN, European, Arab, and U.S. actors may push Israel to hold off annexation.
Impact on peace efforts — whether this move advances talks or intensifies tensions in the region.
In simple terms: On the sidelines of the UN, Trump reportedly told Arab leaders he will not let Israel annex the West Bank. This is a bold departure from past ambiguity. The promise signals U.S. willingness to take a stand on one of the most sensitive and volatile issues in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Whether Trump can turn words into action—and whether Israel accepts that constraint—remains to be seen.