The Palestinian Authority (PA) has welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s renewed efforts to end the war in Gaza, saying it will cooperate in pursuing a lasting peace. This support from the PA adds weight to the idea that peace might be possible — but many tough obstacles remain.
TradingView
What Did the PA Say?
The PA praised Trump’s initiative, describing his efforts as sincere and timely. It reaffirmed its readiness to work with the U.S. and other partners to reach a comprehensive deal for peace.
TradingView
According to the Palestinian news agency WAFA, the PA said it wants any agreement to be based on the long-standing principle of a two-state solution — meaning an independent Palestine and Israel living side by side.
TradingView
In another statement, the PA thanked Trump for his “sincere and tireless efforts” to bring an end to conflict.
The Jerusalem Post
What the Peace Plan Proposes for the PA
In the peace framework under discussion, the PA would have a meaningful role — especially in post-war governance and transition in Gaza. Some of the proposals include:
After a ceasefire, a transitional administrative committee would operate in Gaza under the umbrella of the Palestinian Authority.
Reuters
An international stabilization mission, invited by the PA, would help provide security, monitor the ceasefire, and assist in the transition of authority.
Reuters
The plan calls for reforms within the PA: better governance, transparency, fiscal responsibility, and capacity building.
Reuters
The PA would be expected to prepare for democratic elections across Palestinian territories, including Gaza and East Jerusalem, under international supervision.
Reuters
These proposals suggest that the PA could regain administrative influence in Gaza — a region from which it was largely excluded after Hamas took control in 2007.
Why PA Support Matters
Legitimacy
The PA is widely seen by many nations and international organizations as the official representative body of the Palestinians. Its backing gives the peace plan more credibility on the world stage.
On-the-ground presence
The PA already runs many civil services in the West Bank. If it were able to extend its reach into Gaza under the peace framework, that could help stabilize governance.
Bridge between factions
Because Palestinian politics is divided — especially between the PA (led by Fatah) and Hamas (which controls Gaza) — PA involvement signals a push toward unifying governance structures under a recognized civilian body.
International support
Many international donors and institutions support the PA’s reform agenda. If the peace plan leans on the PA, it may attract more funding and diplomatic backing.
Challenges Ahead
Even with PA support, there are many hurdles:
Hamas’s reaction: Hamas has not publicly accepted the plan. For the PA to take charge in Gaza, Hamas would have to step aside or cooperate — a major hurdle.
Trust and legitimacy: Some Palestinians distrust the PA, viewing it as beholden to external powers or too weak to stand up to Israel or Hamas.
Security concerns: Transferring authority in Gaza will require delicate arrangements for security forces, the disarmament or policing of militant groups, and protection of civilians.
Implementation: Even if agreements are signed, putting them into action (especially across Gaza and the West Bank) will be complex, requiring international oversight and guarantees.
Conclusion
The Palestinian Authority’s endorsement of Trump’s peace efforts is a significant diplomatic move. By aligning itself with the proposal and offering to take part in governance, the PA positions itself as a central actor in any future peace deal. But the path from words to reality will be difficult. The success of this plan will depend on how well the PA, Hamas, Israel, and international partners navigate trust, security, and political power during and after the transition.