Ammar al-Hakim, an Iraqi cleric and political leader, said Iran’s victory in what he termed as its recent “imposed war” has sent an emphatic signal to the international community: that Iran remains an undaunted regional power capable of withstanding external pressures and military aggression.
Hakim made these comments during a speech marking the Iran-Iraq War’s conclusion anniversary in Baghdad. He highlighted how, despite decades of sanctions, isolation, and proxy conflicts against it, Iran proved its resilience by coming back stronger from these latest confrontations – solidifying its place as a strategic player within the Middle East.
Hakim described this conflict as an “imposed war,” suggesting that Iran had been forced into defensive tactics by adversaries who underestimated its military and political tenacity. Hakim asserted that Iran showed not only its capability of protecting sovereignty but also projecting strength to change regional dynamics with this victory.
His comments addressed both domestic and international audiences, emphasizing Iran’s ability to rebound quickly from conflict while supporting allies across the region. Analysts note that such statements bolster Tehran’s narrative of resistance by framing victory as collective achievement among regional partners united against Western influence.
Regional and Global Implications
Observers suggest Hakim’s remarks reflect an increasing recognition across the Middle East of Iran’s lasting influence. Tehran has used its military capacity, especially drone and missile technology, in several recent conflicts; rivals acknowledge its ability to skirt sanctions and adapt quickly to changing battlefield realities.
Hakim also encouraged regional actors to reconsider strategies that seek to isolate Iran. He advocated dialogue and cooperation as opposed to confrontation, warning that efforts at marginalizing Tehran will only add further instability to the Middle East region.
Western officials remain wary. Although acknowledging Iran’s resilience, many also highlight their regional ambitions and nuclear program as major points of contention with Washington, Brussels, and Gulf capitals – Washington views Tehran’s increasing influence as an existential threat given that it supports groups in Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq.
Hakim also used the event to highlight Iraq’s delicate balance. Being neighbor and historical antagonist to Iran, Iraq knows first-hand what prolonged conflict costs; currently Baghdad seeks to preserve strong relations with Tehran while simultaneously forging links with Arab neighbors and Westerners. Hakim suggested that Iran’s demonstrated strength might pave way for “new understandings” that prioritize stability and mutual respect between Baghdad and Tehran.
Looking Ahead
The statement by Iran’s cleric adds to an existing narrative within the region that highlights Iran’s continued survival and success against adversarial coalitions as a key power broker. Tehran may use portraying recent confrontation as a “victory” as a means to strengthen domestic cohesion, deter rivals, and show its allies that Iran remains reliable partner.
As yet, its effect on diplomatic or economic gains remains uncertain, but one thing is for certain: Iran’s regional and global rivals must now contend with an embattled country that remains an active global actor despite decades of isolation.